Mickey Spillane doesn’t quite get the respect he deserves.  Some of this is understandable.  Mike Hammer is a two-fisted anti-communist with little regard for modern sensibilities—then or now.  But that doesn’t diminish Spillane’s stature as a writer.  I can’t think of any other hardboiled writer who could write with such violence.  I don’t just mean beating up punks.  God knows, Hammer did plenty of that—and did it with gusto. 

More than that, however, Spillane made better use of the first-person narrator than anyone since Raymond Chandler.  And Hammer’s narration is a great propulsive violence.  And this is what makes Spillane so different from Hammett, Chandler, Macdonald or any of the other great hardboiled scribes—and what secures his spot among them.  Spillane is great because no one else could write the tough guy as he did.  

13 notes

  1. street-popper reblogged this from dispatchesfromnoir
  2. inkyheels reblogged this from dispatchesfromnoir and added:
    It has been a long while since I’ve read a Mike Hammer mystery! I should devote some time to re-reading a few. It might...
  3. thelamplightersserenade said: I dunno. I feel he leaves nothing to the imagination. It feels like he’s handing us a plate of cold food no one wanted but then begins to shove it down our throats. Hammer’s flaws are a bit overwhelming but I admit. Spillane is a helluva writer.
  4. dirtyriver reblogged this from dispatchesfromnoir
  5. dispatchesfromnoir posted this