The Folksinger

He was old.  The songs he sang were older than he was, but not by much.  His voice wasn’t what it was.  It had once been rangy and wild.  He had once been rangy and wild.  Now he sang in a hushed, reedy whisper.  His voice was bloodied, but his head was unbowed.  He was tall still.  Close to gaunt.  His white hair was thinner than it had been.  Everything about him was.  The curls were gone.  They would have called them “trademark curls,” if they had talked that way back when.  But the curls were no more, and straight white hair streamed down to his shoulders.  He held his head erect.

He sang of rambling and running and rebellion.  But he was a sedate old man.  The only sentiment that made much sense was regret.  His songs had new meaning in his old age.  He sang songs he’d sung for four or five decades.  But the songs weren’t the same.  His voice didn’t sound the same.  But that wasn’t all.

The folksinger sang about drinking too much.  Chasing too many bad women, leaving too many good ones behind.  He sang about doing what he wanted.  He sang about not being able to stop doing what he wanted.  All these songs had been heard on scratchy vinyl for decades.  But they were new.  He wasn’t singing about a night of drinking too much any more.  He was singing about a life of drinking too much.  

He’d drank too much, bedded too many women, destroyed his liver, his voice and God knows what else.  But he was still singing.  His concert was less a celebration than an arraignment.  He wasn’t what he was.  He wanted us all to know.  Each song indicted those responsible.  Some overtly, as he lamented hard living and broken relationships.  Others implicitly, as his staccato mumbles lurched through songs written for his once-impressive vocal range.  

But each song blamed those responsible.  He wanted us to know who the guilty parties were.  So each song blamed each bottle of whiskey.  Every whore.  And himself.

27 notes

These are exciting days here at Dispatches from Noir.  I am proud to say that I am now the resident American correspondent at Crime Fiction Lover.  CFL is an terrific site where mysteries of all kinds are reviewed, and it also has other excellent features.  Today at Crime Fiction Lover, an interview with Max Allan Collins is hot off the press.  If you’re a fan of Collins, hardboiled crime fiction or Mickey Spillane, you’ll definitely want to check it out.  
I began my tenure with Crime Fiction Lover by reviewing Jens Lapidus’ debut novel Easy Money.  I’ve previously talked about the movie Snabba Cash here at Dispatches from Noir.  The movie was very good (and beat the hell out of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo), but the book was even better.  Easy Money left me really looking forward to the rest of the Stockholm Noir trilogy.  So go check out my review at CFL.  
About a month ago, I was fortunate to see Jens Lapidus during his small American book tour (only 7 US cities) to promote his novel.  I was very impressed as he gave a short lecture about his legal experiences (Lapidus is still a practicing defense attorney) and writing process, then answered questions from the audience.  Lapidus acknowledged that what is termed Scandinavian noir is more or less synonymous with Scandinavian crime fiction.  In contrast to most Scandinavian crime fiction, however, Lapidus can claim definite noir influence.  
Among those Jens Lapidus listed as noir influences were James Ellroy, Dennis Lehane and Elmore Leonard.  He also mentioned other hardboiled or noirish authors he enjoyed, such as Raymond Chandler, Walter Mosley and George Pelecanos.  Lapidus’ staccato prose was especially influenced by Ellroy and Chandler, and he freely acknowledged his debt.
In short, Lapidus a new author squarely in the noir/hardboiled tradition both thematically and stylistically.  I highly recommend Easy Money.  But I recommend Crime Fiction Lover (including my review of Easy Money) even more highly.  Check out CFL for reviews on all sorts of mysteries, and you can always find my reviews by clicking the CFL Reviews link at the top of every Dispatches from Noir page.
You needn’t worry this will take me away from Dispatches from Noir (if any of you find that a worrying thought, which is unlikely). I will still be here and still be talking about noir and answering your questions about it.  I’ve got some good stuff in the works for this week.  Stay tuned!

These are exciting days here at Dispatches from Noir.  I am proud to say that I am now the resident American correspondent at Crime Fiction Lover.  CFL is an terrific site where mysteries of all kinds are reviewed, and it also has other excellent features.  Today at Crime Fiction Lover, an interview with Max Allan Collins is hot off the press.  If you’re a fan of Collins, hardboiled crime fiction or Mickey Spillane, you’ll definitely want to check it out.  

I began my tenure with Crime Fiction Lover by reviewing Jens Lapidus’ debut novel Easy Money.  I’ve previously talked about the movie Snabba Cash here at Dispatches from Noir.  The movie was very good (and beat the hell out of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo), but the book was even better.  Easy Money left me really looking forward to the rest of the Stockholm Noir trilogy.  So go check out my review at CFL.  

About a month ago, I was fortunate to see Jens Lapidus during his small American book tour (only 7 US cities) to promote his novel.  I was very impressed as he gave a short lecture about his legal experiences (Lapidus is still a practicing defense attorney) and writing process, then answered questions from the audience.  Lapidus acknowledged that what is termed Scandinavian noir is more or less synonymous with Scandinavian crime fiction.  In contrast to most Scandinavian crime fiction, however, Lapidus can claim definite noir influence.  

Among those Jens Lapidus listed as noir influences were James Ellroy, Dennis Lehane and Elmore Leonard.  He also mentioned other hardboiled or noirish authors he enjoyed, such as Raymond Chandler, Walter Mosley and George Pelecanos.  Lapidus’ staccato prose was especially influenced by Ellroy and Chandler, and he freely acknowledged his debt.

In short, Lapidus a new author squarely in the noir/hardboiled tradition both thematically and stylistically.  I highly recommend Easy Money.  But I recommend Crime Fiction Lover (including my review of Easy Money) even more highly.  Check out CFL for reviews on all sorts of mysteries, and you can always find my reviews by clicking the CFL Reviews link at the top of every Dispatches from Noir page.

You needn’t worry this will take me away from Dispatches from Noir (if any of you find that a worrying thought, which is unlikely). I will still be here and still be talking about noir and answering your questions about it.  I’ve got some good stuff in the works for this week.  Stay tuned!

3 notes

Rockford was not just a wisecracking detective. He turned the genre upside, by being the anti hardboiled detective. He did not carry a gun, but kept it in the cookie jar. He lied all the to everyone. He avoided fights, because he lost them. Brilliant

Thanks to iconoclantastic for his excellent point vis à vis The Rockford Files.  Rockford may have been the first (or first widely popular) deconstruction of the hardboiled hero, but he certainly was not the last.  

One of my favorite anti-hardboiled detectives is Andy Barker.  Starring Andy Richter, Andy Barker, P.I., lovingly spoofs hardboiled detectives.  Richter is Andy Barker, a milquetoast accountant who moves into an office formerly occupied by tough-as-nails (and now damn near senile) private dick Lew Staziak.  With episode titles like “The Big No Sleep” and “Dial M for Laptop,” the series mixed hardboiled elements with Richter’s everyman schtick—to absurd and brilliant effect.

Unfortunately, this series only ran for six episodes.  Fortunately, you can watch them all on Hulu.  Broadway star Harve Presnell is especially good as the political incorrect Staziak.  Tony Hale (Of Arrested Development fame) is also an asset to the series.  

6 notes

I shared this on Twitter, but I thought I would also mention it here.  Max Allan Collins recommends ten works of crime fiction.  It is, of course, always easy to quibble with the choices on such lists.  But it’s a damn good list, even if one that I drew up would likely be a little different.  Collins’ list is definitely heavy on the hardboiled and noir, and heavy on the classics.  

Perhaps I will draw up a list of my own.  What about you, tumblchums?  What books would be on your Beginner’s Guide/Essential Works list?

9 notes

James Garner played Philip Marlowe, but his greatest contribution to the PI genre was his turn as the wisecracking ex-con Jim Rockford.  

James Garner played Philip Marlowe, but his greatest contribution to the PI genre was his turn as the wisecracking ex-con Jim Rockford.  

12 notes

First there was Pinterest, and now there is Twitter.  (Yes, I know Twitter actually predates Pinterest, but humor me.)  Right now, I just have a few announcements of posts I’ve made here, but I will expand my use of Twitter and I think it will be a good medium for conveying information or observations that don’t really merit a full-blown post here.  
If you’re on Twitter, follow me or let me know what your ID is.  I’d like to follow you as well.  I’ll also be pointing out some great hardboiled/noir authors on twitter whose tweets might be worth your attention.
Also, I’m on the L.A. Review of Books’ “Noir” list.  Which is kinda flattering.  Especially considering I have tweeted all of 3 or 4 times to date.  But it’s a great publication, and they take noir seriously—so I’ll assume they know what they’re doing.

First there was Pinterest, and now there is Twitter.  (Yes, I know Twitter actually predates Pinterest, but humor me.)  Right now, I just have a few announcements of posts I’ve made here, but I will expand my use of Twitter and I think it will be a good medium for conveying information or observations that don’t really merit a full-blown post here.  

If you’re on Twitter, follow me or let me know what your ID is.  I’d like to follow you as well.  I’ll also be pointing out some great hardboiled/noir authors on twitter whose tweets might be worth your attention.

Also, I’m on the L.A. Review of Books’ “Noir” list.  Which is kinda flattering.  Especially considering I have tweeted all of 3 or 4 times to date.  But it’s a great publication, and they take noir seriously—so I’ll assume they know what they’re doing.

4 notes

The end of the semester was a flight to the finish, as usual.  But I’m recovering nicely  with the help crime fiction, and have already finished a couple books over the weekend (I can read at a pretty decent clip when research projects and grading don’t interfere).  I hope to be writing a bit more, as well.  So watch this space—with any degree of luck, it will be more interesting than it was over the past few weeks.
One book I was eager to read was James Sallis’ sequel to Drive.  Driven does not disappoint.  And yet.  Drive was a taut novella, spare and elegant in its crushing brutality.  Sallis’ laconic prose was economical and precise.  He didn’t paint the picture with a brush.  He carved it with a scalpel.  The wounds bled.  But he didn’t make any more incisions than he had to.  
Sallis’ skill has not abated one jot in Driven.  Again we delight in the efficient, bleak storytelling.  And yet.  The story is brilliant.  And yet.
Unlike Drive, Driven is obviously not a stand-alone story.  I think Megan Abbott is correct, Sallis is leading us to Driver’s inevitable demise, and each brush with death  that Driver escapes will only make us mourn the end more.  But Driven neither the beginning nor the end.  And at only 158 pages, I felt Sallis had ample room to expand his tale.  He could fit Drive, Driven and at least one more book the approximate size of the first two within the confines of a Michael Connelly novel.  
Still, is that a fault of the book, or the author?  I’m not sure.  I want more.  But that might just be because Sallis is a damn good writer.  For better or worse, this damn good writer parcels out his saga in short novellas.  I may not like it.  I want more.  But what can I do?  Sallis doesn’t leave me any choice.  There’s no telling when Driver will hit the skids.  But when he does, I’ll be rubbernecking.

The end of the semester was a flight to the finish, as usual.  But I’m recovering nicely  with the help crime fiction, and have already finished a couple books over the weekend (I can read at a pretty decent clip when research projects and grading don’t interfere).  I hope to be writing a bit more, as well.  So watch this space—with any degree of luck, it will be more interesting than it was over the past few weeks.

One book I was eager to read was James Sallis’ sequel to Drive.  Driven does not disappoint.  And yet.  Drive was a taut novella, spare and elegant in its crushing brutality.  Sallis’ laconic prose was economical and precise.  He didn’t paint the picture with a brush.  He carved it with a scalpel.  The wounds bled.  But he didn’t make any more incisions than he had to.  

Sallis’ skill has not abated one jot in Driven.  Again we delight in the efficient, bleak storytelling.  And yet.  The story is brilliant.  And yet.

Unlike Drive, Driven is obviously not a stand-alone story.  I think Megan Abbott is correct, Sallis is leading us to Driver’s inevitable demise, and each brush with death  that Driver escapes will only make us mourn the end more.  But Driven neither the beginning nor the end.  And at only 158 pages, I felt Sallis had ample room to expand his tale.  He could fit Drive, Driven and at least one more book the approximate size of the first two within the confines of a Michael Connelly novel.  

Still, is that a fault of the book, or the author?  I’m not sure.  I want more.  But that might just be because Sallis is a damn good writer.  For better or worse, this damn good writer parcels out his saga in short novellas.  I may not like it.  I want more.  But what can I do?  Sallis doesn’t leave me any choice.  There’s no telling when Driver will hit the skids.  But when he does, I’ll be rubbernecking.

6 notes

With the news that William Boyd is going to be the latest Bond continuation author, I decided it was high time to read the most recent Bond continuation novel: Jeffrey Deaver’s Carte Blanche.  Deaver joined the ranks of previous Bond continuation novelists Kingsley Amis, John Gardner, Raymond Benson and Sebastian Faulks.  
If we were to compare Deaver to other Bond novelists, he would be in the middle of the pack.  If it were not a Bond novel, Carte Blanche would be an adequate thriller novel rather than a disappointment.  Deaver is certainly is not as bad as the glorified fanfiction of Raymond Benson.  But Deaver should not be compared to these authors.  In attempting to reboot the Bond franchise in the 21st century, Deaver can only be compared to Bond’s first appearance in Casino Royale.  
The comparison is not flattering to Deaver.  Fleming told his tale with verve, style, economy.  Deaver’s Bond, by comparison, is a generic action hero in a bloated plot.  Deaver’s prose cannot compare to Fleming’s.  He tries to cobble together the elements of a Bond novel and translate them to the 21st century.  It is not apparent to this reader that he is capable of either—he certainly cannot do both.  
One has only to look at the final line of each novel to ascertain the differences.  Fleming’s Bond is a hardboiled, brutally efficient Cold Warrior who deserves his double-0 status.  ”Yes, dammit, I said ‘was.’  The bitch is dead now.”  Deaver isn’t altogether comfortable with this attitude in the War on Terror, and tries to humanize Bond: “And, if he correctly recalled the poem Philly Maidenstone had so elegantly quoted, travelling fast meant travelling alone.”
Casino Royale was published in 1953, and the series has shown enormous longevity.  Carte Blanche proved to be a serviceable thriller.  But if it had actually been the first Bond novel, as opposed to an aborted reboot, we would not be talking about the franchise nearly sixty years later.

With the news that William Boyd is going to be the latest Bond continuation author, I decided it was high time to read the most recent Bond continuation novel: Jeffrey Deaver’s Carte Blanche.  Deaver joined the ranks of previous Bond continuation novelists Kingsley Amis, John Gardner, Raymond Benson and Sebastian Faulks.  

If we were to compare Deaver to other Bond novelists, he would be in the middle of the pack.  If it were not a Bond novel, Carte Blanche would be an adequate thriller novel rather than a disappointment.  Deaver is certainly is not as bad as the glorified fanfiction of Raymond Benson.  But Deaver should not be compared to these authors.  In attempting to reboot the Bond franchise in the 21st century, Deaver can only be compared to Bond’s first appearance in Casino Royale.  

The comparison is not flattering to Deaver.  Fleming told his tale with verve, style, economy.  Deaver’s Bond, by comparison, is a generic action hero in a bloated plot.  Deaver’s prose cannot compare to Fleming’s.  He tries to cobble together the elements of a Bond novel and translate them to the 21st century.  It is not apparent to this reader that he is capable of either—he certainly cannot do both.  

One has only to look at the final line of each novel to ascertain the differences.  Fleming’s Bond is a hardboiled, brutally efficient Cold Warrior who deserves his double-0 status.  ”Yes, dammit, I said ‘was.’  The bitch is dead now.”  Deaver isn’t altogether comfortable with this attitude in the War on Terror, and tries to humanize Bond: “And, if he correctly recalled the poem Philly Maidenstone had so elegantly quoted, travelling fast meant travelling alone.”

Casino Royale was published in 1953, and the series has shown enormous longevity.  Carte Blanche proved to be a serviceable thriller.  But if it had actually been the first Bond novel, as opposed to an aborted reboot, we would not be talking about the franchise nearly sixty years later.

1 note

Some observations after watching The Avengers this weekend:
 MacGuffins are okay
Gwyneth Paltrow never wears shoes
If you use a MacGuffin, it’s better if it’s something unsavory characters want because they’re greedy and selfish rather than some device which will allow unsavory characters to take over the world.
Homicide detectives are much more likely to wear bow ties than genius physicists 
3-D is pretty useless
Jeremy Renner will be damn good in The Bourne Legacy this summer if the character isn’t as woefully underdeveloped as Hawkeye
Summer blockbusters that don’t look like wall-to-wall CGI are all too rare
Someone is going to reblog this photo, delete my observational commentary, and make me regret posting the picture in the first place

Some observations after watching The Avengers this weekend:
  1.  MacGuffins are okay
  2. Gwyneth Paltrow never wears shoes
  3. If you use a MacGuffin, it’s better if it’s something unsavory characters want because they’re greedy and selfish rather than some device which will allow unsavory characters to take over the world.
  4. Homicide detectives are much more likely to wear bow ties than genius physicists 
  5. 3-D is pretty useless
  6. Jeremy Renner will be damn good in The Bourne Legacy this summer if the character isn’t as woefully underdeveloped as Hawkeye
  7. Summer blockbusters that don’t look like wall-to-wall CGI are all too rare
  8. Someone is going to reblog this photo, delete my observational commentary, and make me regret posting the picture in the first place

16 notes

It Is What It Is

I was minding my own business. This doesn’t happen very often. Comes in handy in my line of work. But people other than my clients aren’t always very appreciative. For once I was minding my own business. Just meandering.

I heard the click-click-click coming toward me. A guy was walking his bicycle, but I wasn’t paying attention. Maybe my newfound Zen came from my T-shirt. Said “It is what it is.” An attitude I rarely take. For some reason, I thought the shirt was clever.

It is what it is.  An interruption, that’s what it was. I heard an indistinct voice and didn’t realize the dope walking the bicycle was talking to me. He had short hair and dim eyes. I didn’t know if the quizzical expression was the result of a query I hadn’t heard, or if it was permanent.

“Excuse me?” I asked.

He knit his brow a little too earnestly. “Can I read your T-shirt?”

I don’t know, pal. Can you?

10 notes